- #THEBRAIN 9 IMPORT OUTLINE HOW TO#
- #THEBRAIN 9 IMPORT OUTLINE FOR MAC#
- #THEBRAIN 9 IMPORT OUTLINE PRO#
- #THEBRAIN 9 IMPORT OUTLINE SOFTWARE#
- #THEBRAIN 9 IMPORT OUTLINE WINDOWS#
accepting such solutions in numbers, instead of going elsewhere, “going cloud” instead - onto your traditional system, be that Mac* or Windows. So you get what you finally asked for, something not-so-good in the end, instead of allowing for real ace work - “allowing” here meaning “deliver the funds for”, i.e.
#THEBRAIN 9 IMPORT OUTLINE WINDOWS#
to strive to excellence within their respective area of excellence, be that Windows or Apple desktop = “Mac” programming instead, first, you asked them to deliver their goodies on up to four platforms (Win, Mac, i, Android), and then even, nowadays, you ask them for full-featured (!) and secure (?) web applications. Scholz wanted to imply that those people I cited in my implied citation, were/are wrong in their turn, I’m with him, again.īut as said, my main point is, “you” - the majority of “users”, and the majority of participants in this forum - should have allowed developers to do their “home work”, i.e. Scholz here meant my thinking, is obviously another aggression of his, not justified by my wording on the other hand, if Mr. I clearly set up this mind set - to which, again, I don’t adhere -, so “wrong thinking” - IF Mr. Scholz tries to make a “point” here - but he fails miserably, again -, by citing the developer of TablePlan and HyperPlan… who systematically says so in order to cut off expectations / wishful thinking in his offerings - good for him, but in my allegation, I explicitely referred to the opposite “user strategy” - which I do NOT adhere to! but which is quite common!!! - that implies “I want to facilitate / make possible further developments (in general or specific ones)”, so I continue to pay (by updates, in the absence of real inventions by annual “rents”, ditto) even when I could do without those current, minor adjustments I get for those additional payments”.
#THEBRAIN 9 IMPORT OUTLINE SOFTWARE#
Because exactly as you say, i pay for software based on their current features not on what i expect in the future.” With the price you pay the past developments. I’m sending the developer notes on weaknesses, but already rate Life Notes very highly. It doesn’t yet have a proper search function, although it’s under development. Life Notes also allows you to open a spreadsheet view of notes with the same tag and the same “fields” (not unlike the AskSam approach to fields, for those who remember good ole’ AskSam), as well as a “summary” view based on shared headers. Backlinks are nicely implemented, although I prefer Obsidian’s separate lists of backlinks (linked mentions) and – genius! – unlinked cross-references (unlinked mentions). Obsidian does, of course, allow you to look at multiple notes simultaneously.īut Life Notes has a number of interesting refinements. Life Notes in its current beta form is also well worth a look, although it’s not yet as polished as Obsidian.
#THEBRAIN 9 IMPORT OUTLINE PRO#
It’s well worth a look (a free version can be found on the Mac App Store there’s also a – very inexpensive – Pro version).Īh dear, poor old chap – I’ve confused Obsidian with Life Notes.
#THEBRAIN 9 IMPORT OUTLINE FOR MAC#
Unfortunately only available for Mac at the present time. I’ve also been experimenting with an interesting alternative to Scapple, Tidy Mind (by Qrayon: ). My only criticism to date (given that it’s still in beta) is the lack of support for multiple windows, which is a sine qua non of knowledge management systems (IMHO!). Some fascinating features, including their table report and summary report concepts (both based on tags – a genuinely innovative way to use tagging, I must say).
Various lines and area fills can be shown or hidden, and their color and line-widths specified.I’m running Obsidian on macOS, where it works very well.
administrative border) data from the Natural Earth Dataset. Plotly Geo maps have a built-in base map layer composed of "physical" and "cultural" (i.e. That said, every configuration option here is equally applicable to non-empty maps created with the Plotly Express px.scatter_geo, px.line_geo or px.choropleth functions. Note: Plotly Express cannot create empty figures, so the examples below mostly create an "empty" map using fig = go.Figure(go.Scattergeo()).
#THEBRAIN 9 IMPORT OUTLINE HOW TO#
This page documents Geo outline-based maps, and the Mapbox Layers documentation describes how to configure Mapbox tile-based maps. If your figure is created with a px.scatter_geo, px.line_geo or px.choropleth function or otherwise contains one or more traces of type go.Scattergeo or go.Choropleth, the layout.geo object in your figure contains configuration information for the map itself.
If your figure is created with a px.scatter_mapbox, px.line_mapbox, px.choropleth_mapbox or px.density_mapbox function or otherwise contains one or more traces of type go.Scattermapbox, go.Choroplethmapbox or go.Densitymapbox, the layout.mapbox object in your figure contains configuration information for the map itself. Plotly supports two different kinds of maps: